Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
36
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 17.9% 36 Fragile Recovery
2022 33.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 14.7% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 29.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 1.6% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 10.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 16.7% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 16.6% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNETTE GREVIOUS BOARD CHAIRMAN
BROOKE ROGERS BOARD VICE-CHAIRMAN
SUSAN BERRY Board Member
PAMELA GASKINS Board Member
BEVERLY PARLER-RICE Board Member
URSULA ORIANA ROBINSON Board Member
SHANIQUA SIMMONS Board Member
CELESTE SMITH Board Member
JO WYROSDICK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNETTE GREVIOUS BOARD CHAIRMAN
BROOKE ROGERS BOARD VICE-CHAIRMAN
SUSAN BERRY Board Member
PAMELA GASKINS Board Member
BEVERLY PARLER-RICE Board Member
URSULA ORIANA ROBINSON Board Member
SHANIQUA SIMMONS Board Member
CELESTE SMITH Board Member
JO WYROSDICK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA MONTGOMERY Board Member
ANDY COX Board Member
CLIFF EMERY Board Member
BARBARA BEACH Board Member
TONY DEALOIA Board Member
KATHIE GOODWIN BOARD CHAIRMAN
ANNETTE GREVIOUS Board Member
CURTIS FOSKEY Board Member
ISAIAH MCGEE Board Member
SYLVIA TRIMMMIER CO-VICE CHAIRMAN
BROOKE A HOWARD Board Member
LEO TWIGGS Board Member
SHANIQUA SIMMONS Board Member
DEBORAH SAVERANCE CO-VICE CHAIRMAN
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 4 points below the peer median (45 vs. 49).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 36 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.