Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 9.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 15.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 8.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 14.5% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 14.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 11.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 14.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 10.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 7.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Catherine Keen Hock Board President
Jennifer Jones Board Member
Rayna Stoycheva Treasurer
Stephanie Koch Secretary
Julia Testa Board Member
Derek Goldin Board Member
Jasmine Pitt Board President
LaTonya McCummings Board Member
Aaliyah Johnson Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Gentry Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
JENNIFER GENTRY Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
Jennifer Jones Board President
Rayna Stoycheva Board President
Stephanie Koch Secretary
Douglas Cason Board Member
Brian Coghill Board Member
Heather Coghill Board Member
LaTonya McCummings Board Member
Jennifer Scheib Board Member
Joanne Slane Board Member
JENNIFER JONES Board President
RAYNA STOYCHEVA Board President
STEPHANIE KOCH Secretary
BRIAN COGHILL Board Member
HEATHER COGHILL Board Member
JASMIN HAINEY Board Member
JENNIFER REAVIS Board Member
WILL NAPPER Board Member
JENNIFER SCHEIB Board Member
JO SLANE Board Member
DOUGLAS CASON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER GENTRY Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Jennifer Gentry Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
PATSY LAIRD Board Member
BRIAN COGHILL Board Member
HEATHER COGHILL Board Member
Jennifer Jones Board President
JENNIFER JONES Board President
Rayna Stoycheva Board President
RAYNA STOYCHEVA Board President
Stephanie Koch Secretary
JASMIN HAINEY Board Member
Brian Coghill Board Member
STEPHANIE KOCH Secretary
Heather Coghill Board Member
WILL NAPPER Board Member
Jasmin Hainey Board Member
Jennifer Hainey Board Member
Will Napper Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points below the peer median (15 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.