Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 37.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 26.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 47.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 46.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 23.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 17.4% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 19.4% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 23.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 27.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 23.6% 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 24.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 24.7% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 — — 25.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KASTNER Executive Director 21.1% of Rev
ALFRED STURGIS Board Member 16.6% of Rev
ANIL GEHI Board Member —
AMBER JONES Board Member —
DAN GAUGERT Board Member —
MARY ROBERT MCGRATH Board Member —
VALERIE GRASSO Board Member —
CHRIS ANDERSON Board President —
KEITH KAPP Board Member —
KATHERINE PELLACK Board President —
EVELYN MCCAULEY Board Member —
WINSOME O'NEILL Secretary —
DIOGENES RUIZ Board Member —
CHARN REID Board Member —
PAM HEYE Treasurer —
ANN ROBERTSON Board Member —
CHARLES PEACOCK Board Member —
KYLE STILL Board Member —
SALLY THOMAS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KASTNER Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
ALFRED STURGIS Board Member 7.5% of Rev
LESLIE HEAVEY Board Member —
TESIA HARRISON Board Member —
WILLIAM LEE Board Member —
MICHAEL TREXLER Board Member —
CHRIS ANDERSON Board Member —
KEITH KAPP Board Member —
FRANCIS CIANFROCCA Board Member —
CHARN REID Board Member —
RAHSAAN MCNEILL Board Member —
ROB TILLER Board Member —
ANN ROBERTSON Board Member —
LEE WAGNER Treasurer —
KAY PELLACK Board President —
EVELYN MCCAULEY Secretary —
JEFF HENSLEY Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KASTNER Executive Director 18.2% of Rev
ALFRED STURGIS Board Member 12.9% of Rev
TESIA HARRISON Board Member —
WILLIAM LEE Board Member —
MICHAEL TREXLER Board Member —
MEGAN GRAY Board Member —
KAY PELLACK Board Member —
MATT SAWCHAK Board Member —
FRANCIS CIANFROCCA Board Member —
CHARN REID Board Member —
FRANCINE ROBERSON Board Member —
ROB TILLER Board Member —
LESLIE HEAVEY Board President —
LEE WAGNER Treasurer —
STEPHANIE DEMING Secretary —
JEFF HENSLEY Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 222 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (15 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 37.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~32 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.