Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 33.8% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 14.5% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 24.7% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 16.5% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 1.4% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 11.6% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 — — 16.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 17.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 17.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 24.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 13.9% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 19.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 3.4% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER LEONARD Board Member 20.6% of Rev
MARCO NISTICO Board Member 0.1% of Rev
LIZ FOSTER Board President —
MARJORIE KEYMER Board President —
BETTYE THOMAS CHAMBERS Secretary —
DOUG LEE Treasurer —
STEVE BALDWIN Board Member —
LAMAR CECIL Board Member —
ALLISON DAUGHERTY Board Member —
DELORES FOWLER Board Member —
MARY CATHERINE GARRISON Board Member —
MARGARET ANNE HILL Board Member —
SHIRLEY SAUNDERS JONES Board Member —
WENDY KENNEDY Board Member —
SUSAN MORRIS Board Member —
DAVID NEUMEYER Board Member —
JANICE C PUCKETT Board Member —
PATRICIA SCHEWEL Board Member —
DAVID TATE Board Member —
ROBERT C WOOD III Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER LEONARD Board Member 15.4% of Rev
MARCO NISTICO Board Member 6.1% of Rev
LIZ FOSTER Board President —
MARJORIE KEYMER Board President —
BETTYE THOMAS CHAMBERS Secretary —
DOUG LEE Treasurer —
TOM RICHARDS Board Member —
STEVE BALDWIN Board President —
BRUCE CHRISTIAN Board President —
LAMAR CECIL Board Member —
ALLISON DAUGHERTY Board Member —
LAUREN DIANICH Board President —
MARY CATHERINE GARRISON Board Member —
MARGARET ANNE HILL Board Member —
WENDY KENNEDY Board President —
DAVID LEE Board Member —
POWELL M LEITCH III Board Member —
DAVID NEUMEYER Board President —
JANICE C PUCKETT Board Member —
PATRICIA SCHEWEL Board President —
DAVID TATE Board Member —
ROBERT C WOOD III Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIZ FOSTER Board President —
MARJORIE KEYMER Board President —
BETTYE THOMAS CHAMBERS Secretary —
DOUG LEE Treasurer —
STEVE BALDWIN Board Member —
LAMAR CECIL Board Member —
ALLISON DAUGHTERY Board Member —
LAUREN DIANICH Board Member —
MARY GARRISON Board Member —
WENDY KENNEDY Board Member —
DAVID NEUMEYER Board Member —
JANICE C PUCKETT Board Member —
TOM RICHARDS Board Member —
PATRICIA SCHEWEL Board Member —
DAVE TATE Board Member —
ROBIN WOOD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 242 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 22 points below the peer median (42 vs. 64).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.