Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 44 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Whiteley | Board President | — | ||
| Cindy Trenholm | Board President | — | ||
| Sarah Maldonado | Secretary | — | ||
| Bruce Jones | Treasurer | — | ||
| James Burr | Treasurer | — | ||
| Kate Adams | Board Member | — | ||
| Jeanne Allie | Board Member | — | ||
| Julie Bezanson | Board Member | — | ||
| Steven Walker | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cindy Trenholm | Board President | — | ||
| Liz Whiteley | Board President | — | ||
| Sarah Maldonado | Secretary | — | ||
| Bruce Jones | Treasurer | — | ||
| Kate Adams | Board Member | — | ||
| Jeanne Allie | Board Member | — | ||
| Julie Bezanson | Board Member | — | ||
| James Burr | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 130 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 23 points below the peer median (5 vs. 28).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 41 → 41 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.