Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 23.1% 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 17.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 19.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 35.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREG BEHR Board Member —
MAYME BOYD Board Member —
MARCIA ESPINOLA GRIMES Board Member —
BARBARA HENGSTENBERG Board Member —
RICHARD HARBER Board Member —
LESLEY LANDIS Board Member —
ELISABETH LEWIS CORLEY Board Member —
GILDA MCDANIEL Board President —
SUE SZARY Treasurer —
ERICA BERRY Secretary —
HEATHER BUSTER Board President —
CHERYL CHAMBLEE Executive Director —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL CHAMBLEE Artistic Director 12.0% of Rev
SELBE BARTLETT Board Member 7.4% of Rev
GILDA MCDANIEL Board President —
ELISABETH LEWIS CORLEY Treasurer —
LESLEY LANDIS Secretary —
ROBERT SHI Board Member —
ERICA BERRY Board Member —
KELLY CLARK BOLDT Board Member —
MAYME BOYD Board Member —
HEATHER BUSTER Board Member —
MARTIN FROST Board Member —
KRISTI KERINS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL CHAMBLEE Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
TAYLOR HOBBS Board President —
ELISABETH LEWIS CORLEY Board Member —
GILDA MCDANIEL Secretary —
SELBE BARTLETT Treasurer —
BETT WILSON FOLEY Board Member —
MARTIN FROST Board Member —
HEATHER BUSTER Board Member —
LESLIE LANDIS Board Member —
KAREN HOWARD Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TAYLOR HOBBS Board President —
BETT WILSON FOLEY Board President —
SELBE BARTLETT Treasurer —
GILDA MCDANIEL Secretary —
ELISABETH LEWIS CORLEY Board Member —
KAREN HOWARD Board Member —
DANI JOHNSON Board Member —
LESLEY L LANDIS Board Member —
DAWN PORTER Board Member —
SUE SZARY Board Member —
MARTIN FROST Board Member —
HEATHER BUSTER Board Member —
TAYLOR HOBBS Board President —
BETT WILSON FOLEY Board President —
SELBE BARTLETT Treasurer —
GILDA MCDANIEL Secretary —
ELISABETH LEWIS CORLEY Board Member —
KAREN HOWARD Board Member —
DANI JOHNSON Board Member —
LESLEY L LANDIS Board Member —
DAWN PORTER Board Member —
SUE SZARY Board Member —
MARTIN FROST Board Member —
HEATHER BUSTER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 222 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (5 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.