Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 51 Fragile Recovery
2023 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 19.0% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 18.7% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 20.1% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 23.6% 40 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 6.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 7.9% 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 18.6% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 8.0% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN KNOWLES Board Member
ROBYN MINGLE Board Member
JOHN POPE Board Member
KAREN MCGUIRE Board Member
JOHN JONKHOFF Board Member
KAREN SADLOWSKI Board Member
BOB MCCREARY Board Member
ANNE WEPNER Board Member
ERICA ISENHOUR Board Member
ANDY LOMINAC Board Member
ANN METZ Board Member
DEB MCKEEL Board Member
LESA WILLIAMS Board Member
KIM JORDAN Board Member
ROWENA HODGE Treasurer
ASHLEY BANDY Board President
KIM WALLACE-REPAIRE Board President
KURT SIGMON Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN KNOWLES Board Member
ROBYN MINGLE Board Member
JOHN POPE Board Member
JOHN MORRISON Board Member
KAREN SADLOWSKI Board Member
MICHELE MCCREARY Board Member
ANNE WEPNER Board Member
KIM WALLACE-REPAIRE Board Member
KURT SIGMON Board Member
DAVID HOOD Board Member
MABEL SIGMON Board Member
CARLA ROBINSON Board Member
LESA WILLIAMS Board Member
ALLEN WOOD Board Member
JANET MATTHEWS Secretary
KAREN MCGUIRE Board President
ASHLEY BANDY Treasurer
BILL MORGAN Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARSHA MILLSAPS Board Member
ROBYN MINGLE Board Member
JOHN POPE Board Member
JUDY IKERD Board Member
ANDY LOMINAC Board Member
MICHELE MCCREARY Board Member
ANNE WEPNER Board Member
ASHLEY BANDY Board Member
WILLIAM PARRISH Board Member
DAVID HOOD Board Member
CAROLINE KEENAN Board Member
AMY WALKER Board Member
LESA WILLIAMS Board Member
ALLEN WOOD Board Member
KAREN MCGUIRE Treasurer
JANET MATTHEWS Secretary
KIM WALLACE-REPAIRE Board President
BILL MORGAN Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARSHA MILLSAPS Board Member
ROBYN MINGLE Board Member
JOHN POPE Board Member
JUDY IKERD Board Member
KAREN MCGUIRE Board Member
ANDY LOMINAC Board Member
JANET MATTHEWS Board Member
MICHELE MCCREARY Board Member
ANNE WEPNER Board Member
WILLIAM PARRISH Board Member
CAROLINE KEENAN Board Member
MARY LAIL Board Member
SAMANTHA MUNOZ STYER Board Member
MATT WINTERS Board Member
JEANNE LAWS Secretary
KIM WALLACE-REPAIRE Treasurer
DAVID HOOD Board President
BILL MORGAN Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.