Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
39
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 2.1% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 1.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 3.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 2.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 2.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 2.2% 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 3.2% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 4.9% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 4.7% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 4.1% 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ZALMAN GRINBERG Executive Director 1.0% of Rev
KAREN FOSTER Board President
CLAYTON I DUNCAN Board President
MARGARET A DEAL Treasurer
ELISE GANNAWAY Treasurer
JANE SMALL Secretary
LENORE BEHAR Board Member
MAURICE W BOSWELL Board Member
SUSAN BRIGHAM Board Member
CLYMER CEASE Board Member
ANNA GOODMON Board Member
STEFANIE KAHN Board Member
MOISE KHAYRALLAH Board Member
ROBERT SCHANTZ Board Member
CHARLIE SILVER Board Member
KATHERINE WHITE Board Member
LESLEY WILSON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELLE WEATHERS Executive Director 0.9% of Rev
ZALMAN RAFFAEL GRINBERG Executive Director 0.8% of Rev
MOISE KHAYRALLAH Board Member
LENORE BEHAR Board Member
CLYMER CEASE Board Member
ANNA GOODMON Board Member
STEFANIE KAHN Board Member
ROSE MELTZER Board Member
SUSAN BRIGHAM Board Member
ROBERT SCHANTZ Board Member
SANDY SULLY Board Member
KATHERINE WHITE Board Member
LESLEY WILSON Board Member
JUDY ZELNAK Board Member
CHARLIE SILVER Board Member
CLAYTON DUNCAN Board President
MARGARET DEAL Treasurer
ELISE GANNAWAY Treasurer
KAREN FOSTER Board President
JANE SMALL Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELLE WEATHERS Executive Director 0.8% of Rev
ZALMAN RAFFAEL GRINBERG Executive Director 0.7% of Rev
MOISE KHAYRALLAH Board President
CLAYTON DUNCAN Board President
MARGARET DEAL Treasurer
ELISE GANNAWAY Treasurer
KAREN FOSTER Secretary
LENORE BEHAR Board Member
CLYMER CEASE Board Member
CANDACE COVINGTON-OLANDER Board Member
ANNA GOODMON Board Member
STEFANIE KAHN Board Member
ROSE MELTZER Board Member
ROCHELLE PRYSTOWSKY Board Member
SUSAN BRIGHAM Board Member
ROBERT SCHANTZ Board Member
SANDY SULLY Board Member
KATHERINE WHITE Board Member
LESLEY WILSON Board Member
JUDY ZELNAK Board Member
CHARLIE SILVER Board Member
JANE SMALL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 39 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.