Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 53 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDY FREEMAN Treasurer —
EARL DORSEY VICE-PRESIDE —
J F BRYAN Board Member —
BARBARA GUILLAUME Secretary —
ALFRED KENNEDY Board Member —
DIANNE MALL Board Member —
GINNY MAY Board Member —
DAVID MOORE Board Member —
MARCIA WEBER Board Member —
MARTHA PEARSON Board Member —
RICK SHACKELFORD Vice President —
JF BRYANPEGGY Board Member —
BETH ACKER Treasurer —
OLIVIA HOLT Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHYLLIS DAVIS Board President —
EARL DORSEY VICE-PRESIDE —
BROOKE MACKINNON Secretary —
LANA JORDAN Treasurer —
J F BRYAN Board Member —
KATHLEEN RIVERS-CARROLL Board Member —
BARBARA GUILLAUME Secretary —
MARTHA INGRAM Board Member —
ALFRED KENNEDY Board Member —
DIANNE MALL Board Member —
GINNY MAY Board Member —
DAVID MOORE Treasurer —
CHERYL PARLATO Board Member —
MARCIA WEBER Board Member —
MARTHA PEARSON Board Member —
RICK SHACKELFORD Board Member —
JF BRYANPEGGY Board Member —
BETH ACKERNEIL Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT L BROWN VICE PRESIDE —
PHYLLIS DAVIS Board President —
MARTHA INGRAM Board Member —
DAVID JACOBSON Board Member —
LANA JORDAN Treasurer —
DENNIS LEFTWICH Board Member —
BROOKE MACKINNON Secretary —
DIANNE MALL Board Member —
CHERYL PARLATO Board Member —
MARTHA PEARSON Board President —
ROBERT WILLIAMS Board Member —
JF BRYAN Board Member —
GINNY MAY Board Member —
MARCIA WEBER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT L BROWN Board Member —
PHYLLIS DAVIS VICE PRESIDE —
MARTHA INGRAM Board Member —
DAVID JACOBSON Board Member —
LANA JORDAN Treasurer —
DENNIS LEFTWICH Board Member —
BROOKE MACKINNON Secretary —
DIANNE MALL Board Member —
CHERYL PARLATO Board Member —
MARTHA PEARSON Board President —
ROBERT WILLIAMS Board Member —
JF BRYAN Board Member —
GINNY MAY Board Member —
MARCIA WEBER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT L BROWN Board Member —
PHYLLIS DAVIS Secretary —
MICHAEL DUPUIS VICE PRESIDE —
MARTHA INGRAM Secretary —
LANA JORDAN Board Member —
DENNIS LEFTWICH TRESURER —
BROOKE MACKINNON Board Member —
CHERYL PARLATO Board Member —
MARTHA PEARSON PRESDIENT —
ROBERT WILLIAMS Board Member —
DAVID JACOBSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 222 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.