Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 42 Fragile Recovery
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GRAHAM HARRINGTON Board Member
COURTNEY LOWE Board President
MATT LOWE Board Member
ERIC GAGLIARDO Board Member
KRISTINA RAILSBACK Board Member
MIKE LASLEY Board President
WILSON MERICLE Board Member
OLIVER HELSABECK Board Member
LINNEA COON Secretary
KRISTI WIRTH Board Member
MARIA SCHNAITH-IVAN Board Member
RYAN SCHNAITH-IVAN Board Member
THERESE ARMBRUST Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINNEA COON Board Member
OLIVER HELSABECK Board Member
TIFFANY WESTON Board Member
KRISTI WIRTH Board Member
KELLY WESTON Board Member
JENNI PIRKEY Board Member
BILL PIRKEY Board Member
ERIC GAGLIARDO Board Member
MATT LOWE Board Member
GRAHAM HARRINGTON Board Member
ROBERT GALLAZZI Board Member
COURTNEY LOWE Board President
KRISTINA RAILSBACK Secretary
MIKE LASLEY Board President
WILSON MERICLE Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINNEA COON Board Member
OLIVER HELSABECK Board Member
ROBERT GALLAZZI Board Member
ERIC GAGLIARDO Board Member
JANIE PRICE Board Member
KRISTI WIRTH Board Member
MATT LOWE Board Member
KRISTINA RAILSBACK Secretary
COURTNEY LOWE Board President
MIKE LASLEY Board President
WILSON MERICLE Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
OLIVER HELSABECK Board Member
NICK HELMS Board Member
ROBERT GALLAZZI Board Member
KELLY WESTON Board Member
LINNEA BETHANY Board Member
RHETTA WHITTINGTON Board Member
TIFFANY WESTON Board Member
MIKE LASLEY Board Member
ERIC GAGLIARDO Board Member
MATT LOWE Board Member
HOLLY DAVIS Board Member
KRISTINA RAILSBACK Secretary
KRISTIE POST Board Member
KRISTINA RAILSBACK Secretary
JANIE PRICE Board President
COURTNEY LOWE Board President
JANIE PRICE Board President
WILSON MERICLE Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.