Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 24.2% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 22.6% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — — 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 8.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 17.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 17.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 15.1% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 11.7% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 6.9% 46 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL CONROY EXECUTIVE DI 24.2% of Rev
SHARON ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT —
JIM BREWER DEVELOPMENT —
JOE FISHLEIGH Treasurer —
ELEANOR FRASER DEVELOPMENT —
JOANN FREEBURG Vice President —
RITA HOOD Board President —
BILL HUMLEKER EDUCATION —
BONNIE LIKENS MARKETING —
BILL MEDINA Treasurer —
TIM PARKS Treasurer —
CINDY RUZAK DEVELOPMENT —
CAROLYN TACKETT EDUCATION —
AMANDA TRENT EDUCATION —
JULIE WILMOT MARKETING —
PHIL WILMOT Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL CONROY EXECUTIVE DI 23.9% of Rev
CRICKET CRIGLER Board President —
RITA HOOD VICE PRESIDE —
BRADLEY JONES Treasurer —
BILL ELDER Secretary —
MATT ALDRICH Board Member —
SUSAN FRAME Board Member —
ELEANOR FRASER Board Member —
JOANN FREEBURG Board Member —
DAVID HUFF Board Member —
BILL HUMLEKER Board Member —
STEVE JOHNSON Board Member —
TIM PARKS Board Member —
EMILY POOLE Board Member —
RICHARD RICCARDI Board Member —
AMANDA TANT Board Member —
CAROLYN TACKETT Board Member —
SUSAN THOMAS Board Member —
JULIE WILMOT Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL CONROY EXECUTIVE DI 10.8% of Rev
JERRY PYLES Board President —
CRICKET CRIGLER VICE PRESIDE —
JULES HAGYMASSY Secretary —
ROSS NICHOLSON Treasurer —
BILL ELDER Board Member —
DEBBIE EVILIA Board Member —
SUSAN FRAME Board Member —
ELEANOR FRASER Board Member —
JOANN FREEBURG Board Member —
CHERYL HAGYMASSY Board Member —
MARY HIGHBERGER Board Member —
RITA HOOD Board Member —
DAVID HUFF Board Member —
STEVE JOHNSON Board Member —
BRADLEY JONES Board Member —
CAROLINE KNOX Board Member —
EMILY POOLE Board Member —
LARRY SHELTON Board Member —
STEVE STOUT Board Member —
DOUGLAS THIEL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points below the peer median (30 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.