Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 8.9% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 9.2% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 8.6% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 7.7% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 8.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 9.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 7.8% 46 Fragile Recovery
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW PRATER Board Member
DAN T MIKKELSON Board Member
ASHLEY MEDINA Board Member
JJ ZERINGUE Board Member
DALE WATERS Board Member
CONNIE SENKOWSKI Board Member
JOHN GRUBB Board Member
MOLLY BRONSON Board Member
TAYLOR HUTCHINS Board Member
JENNY HUBBARD Board Member
LEAH CAMPION Board President
SUE JENNINGS Secretary
EDWARD NORVELL Board President
MARVIN KING Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBIN ROGERS Board Member
DR LARRY CARLSEN Board Member
MARC T TUCKER Board Member
CORINNE MAULDIN Board Member
DANNY POWELL Board Member
MARVIN KING Board Member
SANDRA ROAKES Board Member
LORI VAN WALLENDAEL Board Member
AMY PRATER Board Member
SUE JENNINGS Board Member
CAROLINE STEPHENSON Board Member
TAYLOR HUTCHINS Board President
EDWARD NORVELL Board President
ALISON VEROS Secretary
ERIC SLIPP Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDY ABRAHAM Board Member
SUE JENNINGS Board Member
SANDRA ROAKES Board Member
MARC T TUCKER Board Member
BRAD WALSER Board Member
DANNY POWELL Board Member
ROBIN ROGERS Board Member
MARVIN KING Board Member
GWEN MATTHEWS Board Member
TAYLOR HUTCHINS Board Member
CORINNE MAULDIN Board Member
LORI VAN WALLENDAEL Board President
AMY PRATER Board President
ERIC SLIPP Treasurer
ALISON VEROS Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.