Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 7.3% 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 8.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 8.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 6.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 5.8% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 6.9% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 5.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 6.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 6.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 10.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY JORDAN KINCAID END 21523 EXECUTIVE DI 6.0% of Rev
AMY JORDAN KINCAID EXECUTIVE DI 5.5% of Rev
LYNN GWYN Board Member —
SAM METZLER Board Member —
ADAM SEBASTIAN Board Member —
OWENS DANIELS Board Member —
BUD MARTIN Board Member —
KATIE WILLIAMS Board Member —
DOROTHY HURT Board Member —
ALEXANDER GERSHNER Board Member —
BRIDGET HAYES Board Member —
MARK JONES Board Member —
LAURANITA KATENDE Board Member —
KATIE LEFELER Board Member —
NIKKI MOORE Board Member —
TRENT WALL Board Member —
DAVID VALLIERE Board President —
KAREN MORRIS Secretary —
LYN WILLIAMS Treasurer —
RICHARD KELLY IMMEDIATE PA —
LAUREN DAVIS BEG 21523 EXECUTIVE DI —
KAREN MORRIS Board Member —
BERNADETTE WALLACE Board Member —
KELLEY GONDRING Board Member —
LYNN GWYN Board Member —
SAM METZLER Board Member —
JOAN SCHANCK Board Member —
ADAM SEBASTIAN Board Member —
DUNCAN LEWIS Board Member —
OWENS DANIELS Board Member —
BUD MARTIN Board Member —
KATIE WILLIAMS Board Member —
RICHARD KELLY Board President —
DANIEL YOHANNES Secretary —
DAVE VALLIERE Treasurer —
DOROTHY HURT IMMEDIATE PA —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY JORDAN KINCAID EXECUTIVE DI 4.8% of Rev
ELIZABETH REPETTI Board Member —
BERNADETTE WALLACE Board Member —
ADAM SEBASTAIN Board Member —
JOAN SCHANCK Board Member —
SAM METZLER Board Member —
OWENS DANIELS Board Member —
LYNN GWYN Board Member —
KELLEY GONDRING Board Member —
KAREN MORRIS Board Member —
STERLING KELLY Board President —
DOROTHY HURT IMMEDIATE PA —
DAVE VALLIERE Treasurer —
DANIEL YOHANNES Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 67 points below the peer median (0 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 34 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.