Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 12.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 2.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 2.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 2.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 1.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 1.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 0.9% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 1.5% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 3.1% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 2.0% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 2.0% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA CLARK BLOODGOOD Board President
AYA TAKEUCHI Treasurer
BARAK BEN-GAL Board Member
ALISON JACKSON Board Member
CHUCK KAPELKE Board Member
BOBBY BRENNAN Board Member
KRYSTA LAPCEVIC Board Member
SHOSHANA CHAZAN Board Member
MEREDITH LAPONTE Board Member
MICHAEL DAILEY Board Member
SHARI HOLLIS-ROSS Board Member
ERICA WEBER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nina Meehan Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
Paul Sugarman Board President
Christina Clark Bloodgood Board President
Steven Giacomi Treasurer
Erica Weber Secretary
Victoria Larson Board Member
Holly Below Board Member
Shoshana Chazan Board Member
Aldona Clottey Board Member
Megan Gardner Board Member
Chuck Kapelke Board Member
Krysta Lapcevic Board Member
Meredith Lapointe Board Member
Andrew Leavitt Board Member
Marcia Linn Board Member
Margaret Micki Miller Board Member
Andrea Walker Board Member
Bobby Brenman Board Member
Barak Ben-Gal Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nina Meehan Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
Paul Sugarman Board President
Christina Clark Bloodgood Board President
Steven Giacomi Treasurer
Victoria Wells Larson Secretary
Vivian Auslander Board Member
Holly Below Board Member
Shoshana Chazan Board Member
Aldona Clottey Board Member
Megan Gardner Board Member
Chuck Kapelke Board Member
Krysta Lapcevic Board Member
Meredith Lapointe Board Member
Andrew Leavitt Board Member
Marcia Linn Board Member
Margaret Micki Miller Board Member
Andrea Walker Board Member
Janet Walker Board Member
Bobby Brenman Board Member
Barak Ben-Gal Board Member
Erica Weber Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.