Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 28.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 — — 36.0% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 24.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 41.0% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 54.4% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 30.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 26.8% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 18.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 14.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 24.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 22.4% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 29.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BLAINE HESS Executive Director 12.6% of Rev
CHRIS BROWN Artistic Director 10.4% of Rev
SELENA MIDKIFF Board Member 5.0% of Rev
CHRISTY DIETZ Artistic Director —
EDDIE BUCKLEN Board President —
SHANA CLAY Treasurer —
JANE FOUTY Secretary —
JEFF COX Board Member —
LISA HAMRICK Board Member —
LAURA HAYES Board Member —
JEAN HAWKS Board Member —
JESSICA LAMBERT Board Member —
RAY LOWTHER Board Member —
MARSHALL MURRAY Board Member —
WALTER TUCKER Board Member —
LACI WEBB Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AUDREY PITONAK-GOFF Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
BLAINE HESS Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
CHRIS BROWN Artistic Director 5.5% of Rev
SELENA MIDKIFF Board Member 5.0% of Rev
CHRISTY DIETZ Board President —
EDDIE BUCKLEN Board President —
SHANA CLAY Treasurer —
JANE FOUTY Secretary —
JB AKERS Board Member —
JEFF COX Board Member —
LAURA HAYES Board Member —
JEAN HAWKS Board Member —
JESSICA LAMBERT Board Member —
RAY LOWTHER Board Member —
MARSHALL MURRAY Board Member —
WALTER TUCKER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SELENA MIDKIFF Executive Director 14.3% of Rev
AUDREY PITONAK-GOFF Executive Director 14.2% of Rev
SELENA MIDKIFF Artistic Director 13.2% of Rev
AUDREY PITONAK-GOFF Executive Director 10.9% of Rev
CHRISTY DIETZ Board President 2.2% of Rev
CHRISTY DIETZ Board President 1.1% of Rev
JESSICA LAMBERT Board Member 0.3% of Rev
LAURA HAYES Board President —
JB AKERS Board Member —
EDDIE BUCKLEN Board Member —
DR PAUL DIETZ Board Member —
SHANA CLAY Treasurer —
JANE FOUTY Board Member —
DAN TATE Board Member —
ANGELA HAAS Secretary —
RAY LOWTHER Board Member —
LAURA HAYES Board President —
SHANA CLAY Treasurer —
ANGELA HAAS Secretary —
JB AKERS Board Member —
EDDIE BUCKLEN Board Member —
JANE FOUTY Board Member —
DAN TATE Board Member —
RAY LOWTHER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in WV with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 61 points below the peer median (15 vs. 76).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.