Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
59
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2017 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Diane Moser Education Coordinator —
Lee Owens Board President —
Lois Walko Secretary —
Carrol Morgan Artistic Director —
Patrice Werner Treasurer —
Charlotte Burrill Docent Coordinator —
Celeste Johnson Artistic Director —
Esther Evans Board Member —
George Meadows Grants And Fundraising —
Lee Cochrane Hospitality Coordinator —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marilynn Deane Mendell Board President —
Lee Owens Board President —
Lois Walko Secretary —
Carrol Morgan Artistic Director —
Patrice Werner Treasurer —
Charlotte Burrill Docent Coordinator —
Celeste Johnson Artistic Director —
Carol Rauh Membership Coordinator —
George Meadows Grants And Fundraising —
Lee Cochrane Hospitality Coordinator —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
59 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 243 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points above the peer median (100 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.