Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 61 Stable Stable Watch
2023 61 Stable Decline Risk
2022 68 Stable Stable Watch
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 65 Stable Stable Watch
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 65 Stable Stable Watch
2017 65 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 61 Stable Decline Risk
2014 65 Stable Stable Watch
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 61 Stable Stable Watch
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Wilt Board President
Ellen Eames Board President
Jeffrey Corriveau Board President
Sheri Beyrau Treasurer
Linda Marley Smith Secretary
Dana Marguiles Cauthen Board Memeber
Michael Diana Board Member
Betsy Forrest Board President
David Murray Board Member
Lynn Murray Board Member
Pamula Revill Board Member
Charity Robinson Board Member
Rob Lauer Board Member
Al Buchannan Board Member
Katy Feldl Board Member
Justin Giroux Board Member
Marvin Sylvest Board Member
Brenda Epling Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points above the peer median (90 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 65 → 61 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.