Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction ↑
Overall
42
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 21.7% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 — — — 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 12.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 8.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 10.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Maloy Artistic Director 21.7% of Rev
Adam Vorhis Board President —
Nishma Patel Secretary —
Mountaine Jonas Board Member —
Ben Baker Board Member —
Mountaine Jonas Board President —
LeeAnn Donnelly Secretary —
Audra Gaiziunas Treasurer —
Ogla Lucia Board Member —
Mary Lynn Wigodsky Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Makoy Artistic Director 20.9% of Rev
Adam Vorhis Chairman —
Adrienne Crowther Vice-Chairman —
Nishma Patel Secretary —
Dave Kerestes Treasurer —
Benjamin Baker Board Member —
Nancy Peterson Board Member —
Eva Clement Board Member —
Barclay Garnett Board Member —
Sandra Alguire Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Maloy Artistic Director 18.3% of Rev
Adam Vorhis Chairman —
Adrienne Crowther Vice-Chairman —
Barclay Garnett Secretary —
David Kerestes Treasurer —
Benjamin Baker Board Member —
Lara Hanes Board Member —
Nancy Peterson Board Member —
Eva Clement Board Member —
Sandra Alguire Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Maloy Artistic Director 13.4% of Rev
Adam Vorhis Chairman —
Adrienne Crowther Vice-Chairman —
Barclay Garnett Secretary —
David Kerestes Treasurer —
Benjamin Baker Board Member —
Lara Hanes Board Member —
Nancy Peterson Board Member —
Eva Clement Board Member —
Sandra Alguire Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (45 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.