Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 64 Stable Stable Watch
2023 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 60 Fragile Recovery
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 65 Stable Stable Watch
2013 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTA STEARN Board President
KATHRYN HORNER Treasurer
SHERRY REICHOW ASSISTANT TR
KATHLEEN LOCKETT Secretary
CHRISTIE RICHARDSON Vice President
KAREN NOBLE Vice President
JEN DRAKE Vice President
SHRUTI GADKARI Vice President
BETH GLOE Vice President
RACHEL BRIGGS Vice President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAIRE HUELSMANN Vice President
ALICIA TREGLOWN Vice President
AMANDA WALLIS Vice President
LAUREN HUYCK Board President
KARENNA AWTRY Treasurer
SCOTT EVANS ASSISTANT TR
MARY VISH Secretary
KATHRYN HORNER Vice President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 64 points above the peer median (100 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.