Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 16.8% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 36.8% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORRAINE N MADDEN Executive Director 17.2% of Rev
SHERRY OLANDER Board President
JOHN BLANDIN Treasurer
CARRIE DUGAN BRUBAKER Treasurer
POLLY CLARK Board Member
LESLIE HELLERMAN Secretary
SHERI MCGUIRE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORRAINE N MADDEN Executive Director 16.2% of Rev
SHERRY OLANDER Board President
JOHN BLANDIN Secretary
CARRIE DUGAN BRUBAKER Treasurer
WESLEY CRAIG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (55 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 47 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.