Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 — — 37.0% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 — — 28.7% 52 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 27.4% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 17.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 18.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 22.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 25.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 28.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 35.1% of Rev
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member —
MITCH MATTSON Board President —
AIMEE REID Treasurer —
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ Board President —
ELIZABETH DUNN-RUIZ Board Member —
PENNY CAYWOOD Secretary —
JONATHAN JONES Board Member —
SINDY CASTRO Board Member —
MELINDA MOORE Board Member —
MARCUS SIMMONS Board Member —
MICHAEL AVILA Board Member —
SARAH CONKELTON-KIDD Board Member —
CHAD DIKE Board Member —
ALICIA FUSS Board Member —
BRODRICK SANTEZ RYANS Board Member —
COLETTE SILVESTRI Board Member —
NIGEL SEMAJ BARNES Board Member —
MORGANNE EVANS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 29.1% of Rev
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member —
MITCH MATTSON Board President —
AIMEE REID Treasurer —
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ INCOMING CHA —
JAMIE MACPHERSON Board Member —
FRAN SILLAU Board Member —
RHONDA WILSON Board Member —
ELIZABETH PATTERSON Board Member —
PENNY CAYWOOD Secretary —
JONATHAN JONES Board Member —
SINDY CASTRO Board Member —
MELINDA MOORE Board Member —
MARCUS SIMMONS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 26.8% of Rev
FELECIA BROWN Board Member —
WYCKHAM AVERY Board Member —
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member —
LENORA INEZ BROWN Board Member —
JENNIFER KATONA IMMEDIATE PA —
CARLA GOMEZ KLEIN Board Member —
MITCH MATTSON Board President —
AIMEE REID Treasurer —
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ INCOMING CHA —
JAMIE MACPHERSON Board Member —
FRAN SILLAU Board Member —
RHONDA WILSON Board Member —
ELENA VELASCO Board Member —
GUS WELTSEK Board Member —
ELIZABETH PATTERSON Board Member —
PENNY CAYWOOD Secretary —
JONATHAN JONES Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 26.3% of Rev
STACEY ARDELEAN IMMEDIATE PA —
ALEX ATES Board Member —
WYCKHAM AVERY Board Member —
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member —
MAREN GALARPE Board Member —
JENNIFER KATONA Board President —
SARAH KENNY Board Member —
MITCH MATTSON Board Member —
AMIEE REID Treasurer —
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
ANDREW RYDER Board Member —
FRAN SILLAU Board Member —
KIYOKO SIMMS Secretary —
ELENA VELASCO Board Member —
GUS WELTSEK Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 107 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (90 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.