Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 9.9% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 23.6% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 24.6% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 14.2% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 5.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 11.2% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 8.4% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 6.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 14.7% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 15.3% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 4.4% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 9.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2011 5.2% 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irma Garcia Board Member 10.3% of Rev
Roy Byrd Board Member
Paul Sheehan Board President
Richard Collins Board Member
Griff Resor Board Member
Gwen Myers Board Member
Jacob Metrick Board Member
Mark Curchack Secretary
Julia Travers Rickert Board Member
Brian Mountford Board Member
Esther Portyansky Board Member
Kiri Van Lengen Welty Board Member
Don Edwards Board Member
Ted Everett Board Member
Raymond Wells Board Member
Mark Fittipaldi Board Member
John Darrow Treasurer
Kyle Pruett Board Member
Jonathan Clune Board Member
Mande Mischler Board Member
Brenda Ungerland Board Member
Miguel Garcia Board Member
Amy Weller Board Member
Daniel Koenigsberg Board Member
Bebe williamson Board Member
Valerie Norton Board President
Eric Schweikert Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irma Garcia Board Member 9.4% of Rev
Roy Byrd Board Member
Richard Collins Board Member
Griff Resor Treasurer
Gwen Myers Board Member
Mark Curchack Board Member
Brian Mountford Board Member
Raleigh Tozer Board Member
Esther Portyansky Board Member
Raymond Wells Board Member
Julia Travers Rickert Board Member
john darrow Treasurer
Kyle Pruett Board Member
jonathan clune Secretary
Mande Mischler Board Member
miguel garcia Board Member
daniel koenigsberg Board Member
roberta williamson Board Member
Brit Geiger Board President
Valerie Norton Board President
Eric Schweikert Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irma Garcia Board Member 8.7% of Rev
Roy Byrd Board Member
Mark Alberta Board President
Hallie Beacham Board Member
Griff Resor Treasurer
david campbell Board Member
Sarah Ambrogi Board Member
Mark Curchack Board Member
laura couchman Board Member
Brian Mountford Board Member
Raleigh Tozer Board Member
diana deacon Board Member
charles d dilks Board Member
Paul Sheehan Board Member
randall doud Board Member
Ray Wells Board Member
lisa kant Board Member
john darrow Treasurer
jonathan clune Secretary
miguel garcia Board Member
peter sipple Board Member
john todd Board Member
richard wilde Board Member
daniel koenisberg Board Member
roberto martinez Board Member
roberta williamson Board Member
Brit Geiger Board President
Sonya Baker Board Member
Jessee Eshkol Board Member
Valerie Norton Board Member
Eric Schweikert Board Member
Kenneth Westerman Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.