Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
25
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 114.8% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 99.0% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 64.0% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jenna Daly Artistic Director 33.3% of Rev
Jenna Daly Artistic Director 33.3% of Rev
Rachel Morgan Im Board Member 24.9% of Rev
Rachel Morgan Im Board Member 24.9% of Rev
Jaclyn Mathias-Jones Executive Director 20.8% of Rev
Jenna Daly Board Member 11.4% of Rev
Jenna Daly Board Member 11.4% of Rev
Joann Benson Board Member 9.4% of Rev
Joann Benson Board Member 9.4% of Rev
Dianne Delgado General Manager 6.2% of Rev
Dianne Delgado General Manager 6.2% of Rev
Jaclyn Mathias-Jones Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
Diane Jones Accompanist 4.7% of Rev
Diane Jones Accompanist 4.7% of Rev
Tamba Giles Board Member 4.2% of Rev
Virginia Arey Board Member 4.2% of Rev
Brian DeMay Board President —
Andy Lewin Board President —
Brenda Little Treasurer —
Sarah Roche Secretary —
Carolyn DeMay Board Member —
Nick Wagman Board Member —
Renee Rogers Board Member —
Titus Mataban Board Member —
Brian DeMay Board President —
Titus Mataban Board President —
Brenda Little Treasurer —
Suzanne Bromley Secretary —
Carolyn DeMay Board Member —
Renee Rogers Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jenna Daly Artistic Director 33.3% of Rev
Rachel Morgan Im Board Member 22.9% of Rev
Jaclyn Mathias-Jones Executive Director 20.8% of Rev
Jenna Daly Board Member 11.4% of Rev
Joann Benson Board Member 9.4% of Rev
Joseph Meerdter Board Member 7.3% of Rev
Dianne Delgado General Manager 6.2% of Rev
Diane Jones Accompanist 4.7% of Rev
Titus Mataban Board President —
Andy Lewin Board President —
Brenda Little Treasurer —
Sarah Roche Secretary —
Carolyn DeMay Board Member —
Nick Wagman Board Member —
Renee Rogers Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jenna Daly Artistic Director 33.3% of Rev
Rachel Morgan Im Board Member 25.8% of Rev
Jaclyn Mathias-Jones Executive Director 20.8% of Rev
Jenna Daly Board Member 11.4% of Rev
Joann Benson Board Member 9.4% of Rev
Catherine Rudd Board Member 7.6% of Rev
Dianne Delgado General Manager 6.2% of Rev
Diane Jones Accompanist 4.7% of Rev
Titus Mataban Board President —
Andy Lewin Board President —
Brenda Little Treasurer —
Sarah Roche Secretary —
Katherine Corbin Board Member —
Carolyn DeMay Board Member —
Nick Wagman Board Member —
Renee Rogers Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 163 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 27 points below the peer median (42 vs. 69).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 114.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.