Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 53 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Sbarbori | Board President | — | ||
| Stephanie Mumford | Treasurer | — | ||
| John Decker | Board Member | — | ||
| David Dubov-Flinn | Board Member | — | ||
| Steve LaRocque | Board Member | — | ||
| Richard Ley | Board Member | — | ||
| Michele Osherow | Board Member | — | ||
| Amy Reynolds | Board Member | — | ||
| Don Slater | Board Member | — | ||
| Jane Squier-Bruns | Board Member | — | ||
| Jack Sbarbori | Board President | — | ||
| Stephanie Mumford | Treasurer | — | ||
| John Decker | Board Member | — | ||
| David Dubov-Flinn | Board Member | — | ||
| Steve LaRocque | Board Member | — | ||
| Richard Ley | Board Member | — | ||
| Michele Osherow | Board Member | — | ||
| Amy Reynolds | Board Member | — | ||
| Don Slater | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 76 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 58 points above the peer median (90 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 51 → 57 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.