Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 60 Stable Stable Watch
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 60 Stable Decline Risk
2019 64 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN VINCENT JR Board President
D VOGEL VICE PRESIDE
LOREN KNAPP Secretary
MIA KERNZ REC. SECRETA
JEFF MASSAD ADMIN SECRET
DONNA SAUNDERS MEMBERSHIP S
JUDE DELEONARDIS Board Member
BEN HARROUN Board Member
MIKE KERZ Board Member
SUSAN KOCHEVAR Board Member
KYLEEN RUSH Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN VINCENT JR Board President
D VOGEL VICE PRESIDE
LOREN KNAPP Secretary
MIA KERNZ REC. SECRETA
MARK FRANK ADMIN SECRET
DONNA SAUNDERS MEMBERSHIP S
JUDE DELEONARDIS Board Member
BEN HARROUN Board Member
MIKE KERZ Board Member
DENISE KNAPP Board Member
SUSAN KOCHEVAR Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN VINCENT JR Board President
D VOGEL VICE PRESIDE
LOREN KNAPP Secretary
MIA KERNZ REC. SECRETA
MARK FRANK ADMIN SECRET
FRANK FISHHER MEMBERSHIP S
BRENT BARNHART Board Member
DONNA SAUNDERS Board Member
MIKE KERZ Board Member
DENISE KNAPP Board Member
HARRY SAWYER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN VINCENT JR Board President
TIMOTHY SHERMAN VICE PRESIDE
ELIZABETH WALKER Treasurer
LOREN KNAPP REC. SECRETA
MARK FRANK ADMIN SECRET
CAROLYN MCCUTCHEON Board Member
WALTER EFFINGER Board Member
BRYON TEAGARDNER Board Member
JAMES KOPP Board Member
CHARLES WALKER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WALKER Treasurer
LOREN KNAPP Board Member
TIMOTHY SHERMAN Board President
MARK FRANK Board Member
CAROLYN MCCUTCHEON Secretary
BRYON TEAGARDNER Board Member
JOHN VINCENT JR Board President
FRANK FISHER Board Member
CHARLES WALKER Board Member
WALTER EFFINGER Board Member
JAMES KOPP Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points above the peer median (90 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.