Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.6% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 26.9% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 10.6% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 — — 10.8% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 7.7% 46 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 7.9% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 — — 3.0% 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 4.8% 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Marie Rhea Board Member 7.8% of Rev
Alexis Hartwick Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
Mark A Rhea Artistic Director 5.9% of Rev
Robert Cali Treasurer —
Abigail Isaac Fine Board Member —
Abby Levine Board President —
Megan Doiron Board Member —
Roberta Milman Secretary —
Vishwas Vishwas Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN MARIE RHEA Artistic Director 7.4% of Rev
MARK A RHEA FOUNDING DIR 6.8% of Rev
ALEXIS HARTWICK Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
ROBERT CALI Board Member —
ABIGAIL ISAAC FINE Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER HALL Treasurer —
GAIL HANSEN Board Member —
TODD K JONES Board Member —
RICHARD KELLOGG Board Member —
ABBY LEVINE Board Member —
MEGAN MACHNIK EXECUTIVE CH —
ROBERTA MILMAN Board Member —
DANA NEARING Board Member —
VISHWAS VISHWAS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK A RHEA PRODUCING AR 5.2% of Rev
SUSAN MARIE RHEA Artistic Director 4.9% of Rev
TODD K JONES Board Member —
RICHARD KELLOGG Board Member —
ABBY LEVINE Board Member —
MEGAN MACHNIK Board Member —
RYAN VELANDRIA MCCARTHY Board Member —
ROBERTA MILMAN Board Member —
VISHWAS Board Member —
ROBERT CALI Board Member —
WHITNEY DONALDSON Board President —
RODDY FLYNN Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER HALL Board Member —
GAIL HANSEN Board Member —
TODD K JONES Board Member —
RICHARD KELLOGG Board Member —
ABBY LEVINE Board Member —
MEGAN MACHNIK Board Member —
RYAN VELANDRIA MCCARTHY Board Member —
ROBERTA MILMAN Board Member —
DANA NEARING Board Member —
MARK A RHEA PRODUCING AR —
SUSAN MARIE RHEA Artistic Director —
VISHWAS Board Member —
BOB CALI Board Member —
WHITNEY DONALDSON Board President —
RODDY FLYNN Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER HALL Board Member —
GAIL HANSEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 106 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 22 points below the peer median (45 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.