Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 15.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 17.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 23.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 17.8% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 16.5% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 17.5% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 19.4% 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 18.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 21.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 18.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — 19.0% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 18.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 — — 17.6% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH GOTTESMAN Board Member 8.7% of Rev
FRANCIS BUZZ MAURO Board Member 8.1% of Rev
Laura Einstein Board Member —
Adrianne Marsh Board Member —
DENISE HANNA Board President —
Alexis Ronickher Board Member —
Dr Roberto Ifill Board Member —
Rae Vann Board Member —
ibby jeppson Board Member —
ELLEN PERRY Board President —
nia graham Board Member —
Mary Mitchelson Treasurer —
SHERRY DUNCAN Board Member —
JULIE LLOYD Board Member —
Elizabeth Davenport Board Member —
LIZ WHISNANT Secretary —
Luna Samman Board Member —
tracy gray Board Member —
Matt Bassett Board Member —
Megan Robbins Board Member —
MICHELLE DEYOUNG Board Member —
TERRESITA EDWARDS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCIS BUZZ MAURO Board Member 8.1% of Rev
DEBORAH GOTTESMAN Board Member 7.3% of Rev
Laura Einstein Board Member —
BETSY HAGUE Board Member —
DENISE HANNA Secretary —
KRISTINA DUNPHY Board Member —
MARY GOLDSMITH Board Member —
Rae Vann Board Member —
GIL GALLAGHER Board Member —
ELLEN PERRY Board President —
DR ROBERTO IFILL Board President —
HARRY KNIGHT Treasurer —
SHERRY DUNCAN Board Member —
JULIE LLOYD Board Member —
AMANA SIMMONS Board Member —
LIZ WHISNANT Board Member —
Luna Samman Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCIS BUZZ MAURO Board Member 7.8% of Rev
DEBORAH GOTTESMAN Board Member 7.5% of Rev
Laura Einstein Board Member —
RICHARD BLOCH Board Member —
bETSY HAUGE Board Member —
DENISE HANNA Board Member —
MONIQUE FORTENBERRY Board President —
MARY GOLDSMITH Board Member —
Roger Vann Board Member —
TIMOTHY O'TOOLE Secretary —
ELLEN PERRY Board Member —
DR ROBERTO IFILL Board President —
HARRY KNIGHT Treasurer —
LISA BROWN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 75 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 75 points below the peer median (0 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.