Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Nainan-Newhard Board President
Michael Hensen Board President
Rebecca Rupp Secretary
F Dean Pettit Jr Treasurer
Kiley Mead Board President
Louise Van-Guilder Martin Board President
Sophe Kranke Social
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 76 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (55 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.