Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 33.0% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 27.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 33.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 31.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 26.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESUS MANUEL BERARD MUSIC DIRECT 16.4% of Rev
RICHARD DALTON ASST EXEC DI 12.8% of Rev
BRENTON BENFIELD EXECUTIVE DI 10.8% of Rev
JESUS MANUEL BERARD MUSIC DIRECT 8.2% of Rev
KEVIN GILLIS EDUCATION OU 5.7% of Rev
BRENTON BENFIELD EXECUTIVE DI 3.8% of Rev
RICHARD DALTON ASST EXEC DI 2.5% of Rev
KATE BARNES Board Member —
RICHARD DALTON Treasurer —
SANDRA GORDON VICE PRESIDE —
DAVID GOTTLIEB Board Member —
ELISA HILL Secretary —
BLAKE LORENZ Board Member —
PETER MIGNEREY Board Member —
CHERYL NKEBA Board Member —
SUSAN PEARL Board President —
KATE BARNES Board Member —
SHARLISE SHULTERBRANDT Board Member —
RICHARD DALTON Treasurer —
WILLIAM SNIFFIN Board Member —
SANDRA GORDON Board Member —
ELISA HILL Secretary —
GARY KIRKEBY Board Member —
BLAKE LORENZ VICE PRESIDE —
PETER MIGNEREY Board Member —
CHERYL NKEBA Board Member —
SUSAN PEARL Board President —
WILLIAM SNIFFIN Board Member —
KEVIN GILLIS EDUCATION OU —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESUS MANUEL BERARD MUSIC DIRECT 16.4% of Rev
BRENTON BENFIELD EXECUTIVE DI 11.8% of Rev
RICHARD DALTON ASST EXEC DI 3.8% of Rev
KATE BARNES Board Member —
RICHARD DALTON Treasurer —
SANDRA GORDON Board Member —
ELISA HILL Secretary —
BLAKE LORENZ VICE PRESIDE —
PETER MIGNEREY Board Member —
CHERYL NKEBA Board Member —
SUSAN PEARL Board President —
WILLIAM SNIFFIN Board Member —
MARY ANN WHITE Board Member —
KEVIN GILLIS EDUCATION OU —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESUS MANUEL BERARD MUSIC DIRECT 15.7% of Rev
BRENTON BENFIELD EXECUTIVE DI 11.3% of Rev
RICHARD DALTON ASST EXEC DI 3.8% of Rev
ROSALIE ANNE DAHLEN-HARTFIELD Board Member —
RICHARD DALTON Treasurer —
H KEVIN GILLIS EDUCATION OU —
SANDRA GORDON Board Member —
ELISA HILL Secretary —
BLAKE LORENZ VICE PRESIDE —
PETER MIGNEREY Board Member —
CHERYL NKEBA Board Member —
SUSAN PEARL Board President —
EULINE ROSE Board Member —
WILLIAM SNIFFIN Board Member —
MARY ANN WHITE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 164 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (5 vs. 58).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~22 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.