Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 14.3% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 14.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 16.9% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 16.5% 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 19.3% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 — — 18.2% 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 15.0% 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 22.7% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 20.6% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 12.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 15.4% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATHAN CZYZEWSKI Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
SCOTT TUCKER Artistic Director 7.8% of Rev
MATTHEW GARBER Board President —
KAREN FLORINI Board President —
BARBARA ROSSOTTI Secretary —
ANNE B KEISER Treasurer —
LAURA S PRUITT COUNSEL —
SUZANNE BROCK Board Member —
ERIC BROYLES Board Member —
CHARLIE CERF Board Member —
SUE GOODHART END JUNE 2024 Board Member —
ELKE GORDON Board Member —
ALEXANDRA KESSLER Board Member —
MONICA SCHMUDE Board Member —
NICHOLAS SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TUCKER SCOTT Artistic Director 9.7% of Rev
CZYZEWSKI NATHAN TAD Board Member 9.6% of Rev
BROCK SUZANNE Board Member —
CERF CHARLIE Board Member —
FLAXMAN DAVID Board Member —
FLORINI KAREN Board Member —
GARBER MATT Board President —
GORDON ELKE Board Member —
GOODHART SUE Board Member —
KEISER ANNE Treasurer —
KESSLER ALEXANDRA B Board President —
MILLER CRAIG Board President —
PRUITT LAURA SPECIAL ADVISOR/COUNSEL —
RIFFLE EMILY Board Member —
ROSSOTTI BARBARA Secretary —
SMITH NICK Board Member —
TANKERSLY LIZ Board Member —
WILSON ASHLEY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TUCKER SCOTT Artistic Director 10.9% of Rev
CZYZEWSKI NATHAN T Board Member 8.6% of Rev
AVETTA JULIE CIAMPORCERO Board Member —
BROCK SUZANNE Board Member —
CERF CHARLES Board Member —
FLAXMAN DAVID Board Member —
FLORINI KAREN Board Member —
GARBER MATTHEW Board Member —
GOODHART SUE Board Member —
GORDON ELKE Board Member —
HOOVER ED Board Member —
KEISER ANNE Treasurer —
KESSLER ALEXANDRA B Board President —
MILLER CRAIG Board President —
PRUITT LAURA SPECIAL ADVISOR/COUNSEL —
RIFFLE EMILY Board Member —
ROSSOTTI BARBARA Secretary —
SCHAEFER DIANE Board Member —
SMITH NICHOLAS Board Member —
TANKERSLY LIZ Board Member —
WETHINGTON NADINE Board President —
WILSON ASHLEY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TUCKER SCOTT Artistic Director 12.0% of Rev
CZYZEWSKI NATHAN Board Member 9.1% of Rev
AVETTA JULIE CIAMPORCERO Board Member —
BROCK SUZANNE Board Member —
FLAXMAN DAVID Board Member —
FLORINI KAREN Board Member —
GARBER MATT Board Member —
GORDON ELKE Board Member —
GOODHART SUE Board Member —
HOOVER ED Board Member —
KEISER ANNE Treasurer —
KESSLER ALEXANDRA B Board President —
MILLER CRAIG Board President —
PRUITT LAURA SPECIAL ADVISOR/COUNSEL —
RIFFLE EMILY Board Member —
Secretary —
SCHAEFER DIANE Board Member —
TANKERSLY LIZ Board Member —
WETHINGTON NADINE Board President —
WILSON ASHLEY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 106 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 22 points below the peer median (45 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.