Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 14.3% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 14.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 16.9% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 16.5% 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 19.3% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 18.2% 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 15.0% 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 22.7% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 20.6% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 12.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2011 15.4% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATHAN CZYZEWSKI Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
SCOTT TUCKER Artistic Director 7.8% of Rev
MATTHEW GARBER Board President
KAREN FLORINI Board President
BARBARA ROSSOTTI Secretary
ANNE B KEISER Treasurer
LAURA S PRUITT COUNSEL
SUZANNE BROCK Board Member
ERIC BROYLES Board Member
CHARLIE CERF Board Member
SUE GOODHART END JUNE 2024 Board Member
ELKE GORDON Board Member
ALEXANDRA KESSLER Board Member
MONICA SCHMUDE Board Member
NICHOLAS SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TUCKER SCOTT Artistic Director 9.7% of Rev
CZYZEWSKI NATHAN TAD Board Member 9.6% of Rev
BROCK SUZANNE Board Member
CERF CHARLIE Board Member
FLAXMAN DAVID Board Member
FLORINI KAREN Board Member
GARBER MATT Board President
GORDON ELKE Board Member
GOODHART SUE Board Member
KEISER ANNE Treasurer
KESSLER ALEXANDRA B Board President
MILLER CRAIG Board President
PRUITT LAURA SPECIAL ADVISOR/COUNSEL
RIFFLE EMILY Board Member
ROSSOTTI BARBARA Secretary
SMITH NICK Board Member
TANKERSLY LIZ Board Member
WILSON ASHLEY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TUCKER SCOTT Artistic Director 10.9% of Rev
CZYZEWSKI NATHAN T Board Member 8.6% of Rev
AVETTA JULIE CIAMPORCERO Board Member
BROCK SUZANNE Board Member
CERF CHARLES Board Member
FLAXMAN DAVID Board Member
FLORINI KAREN Board Member
GARBER MATTHEW Board Member
GOODHART SUE Board Member
GORDON ELKE Board Member
HOOVER ED Board Member
KEISER ANNE Treasurer
KESSLER ALEXANDRA B Board President
MILLER CRAIG Board President
PRUITT LAURA SPECIAL ADVISOR/COUNSEL
RIFFLE EMILY Board Member
ROSSOTTI BARBARA Secretary
SCHAEFER DIANE Board Member
SMITH NICHOLAS Board Member
TANKERSLY LIZ Board Member
WETHINGTON NADINE Board President
WILSON ASHLEY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TUCKER SCOTT Artistic Director 12.0% of Rev
CZYZEWSKI NATHAN Board Member 9.1% of Rev
AVETTA JULIE CIAMPORCERO Board Member
BROCK SUZANNE Board Member
FLAXMAN DAVID Board Member
FLORINI KAREN Board Member
GARBER MATT Board Member
GORDON ELKE Board Member
GOODHART SUE Board Member
HOOVER ED Board Member
KEISER ANNE Treasurer
KESSLER ALEXANDRA B Board President
MILLER CRAIG Board President
PRUITT LAURA SPECIAL ADVISOR/COUNSEL
RIFFLE EMILY Board Member
Secretary
SCHAEFER DIANE Board Member
TANKERSLY LIZ Board Member
WETHINGTON NADINE Board President
WILSON ASHLEY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points above the peer median (50 vs. 25).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.