Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 30.1% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 27.8% 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 24.9% 51 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 22.5% 51 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 28.1% 50 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 56 Fragile Recovery
2017 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 56 Fragile Recovery
2014 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACK FISHMAN Executive Director 15.6% of Rev
ANTHONY BLAKE CLARK Board Member 11.7% of Rev
CHARLES BERARDESCO Board President
CARMEN FONDA Secretary
DENNIS COLE Treasurer
JEFFREY AUSTIN Board Member
POLLY BEHRENS Board Member
ELLEN BERNARD Board Member
SANDRA BOYD Board Member
JONATHAN CECI Board Member
CHRISTINE COLLINS Board Member
RICHARD DELLHEIM Board Member
DAVID FRANKENBERGER JR Board Member
TAD GLENN Board Member
NATHAN HARTLAND Board Member
MELANIE HOOD-WILSON Board Member
JULIA KELLER Board Member
SCOTT MARDER Board Member
SUSAN MASETH Board Member
JEAN MELLOTT Board Member
NEAL NAFF Board Member
ANNE BEAR POWELL Board Member
RONNIE RENO Board Member
PETER SAVAGE Board Member
ALAN SWEATMAN Board Member
JOHN TRACEY Board Member
ROBERTO VELA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACK FISHMAN Executive Director 13.7% of Rev
ANTHONY BLAKE CLARK Board Member 12.1% of Rev
LAUREN MADSEN Board President
CARMEN M FONDA Secretary
DENNIS P COLE JR Treasurer
ANNE BEAR POWELL Board Member
JEFFREY A AUSTIN Board Member
POLLY E BEHRENS Board Member
CHARLES BERARDESCO Board Member
ELLEN N BERNARD Board Member
SANDRA D BOYD Board Member
RICHARD A DELLHEIM ESQ Board Member
ANDREW ERMAN Board Member
DAVID FRANKENBERGER JR Board Member
GORDON H GLENN Board Member
NATHANAEL D HARTLAND ESQ Board Member
JULIA KELLER Board Member
SUSAN R MASETH Board Member
RYAN B MORAN Board Member
JAMES PIPER III Board Member
RUSSELL R RENO JR ESQ Board Member
PETER V SAVAGE Board Member
JONATHAN CECI Board Member
ALAN SWEATMAN MD Board Member
JOHN D TRACEY Board Member
CHRISTINE M COLLINS Board Member
NEAL NAFF MD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACK FISHMAN Executive Director 13.9% of Rev
ANTHONY BLAKE CLARK Board Member 11.5% of Rev
RICHARD A DELLHEIM ESQ Board Member
ANDREW ERMAN Board Member
DAVID FRANKENBERGER JR Board Member
GORDON H GLENN Board Member
NATHANAEL D HARTLAND ESQ Board Member
JULIA KELLER Board Member
SUSAN R MASETH Board Member
RYAN B MORAN Board Member
JAMES PIPER III Board Member
RUSSELL R RENO JR ESQ Board Member
PETER V SAVAGE Board Member
P DAVID SOWELL Board Member
ALAN SWEATMAN MD Board Member
JOHN D TRACEY Board Member
CHRISTINE M COLLINS Board Member
LAUREN MADSEN Board President
CARMEN M FONDA Secretary
DENNIS P COLE JR Treasurer
ANNE BEAR POWELL Board Member
JEFFREY A AUSTIN Board Member
POLLY E BEHRENS Board Member
CHARLES BERARDESCO Board Member
ELLEN N BERNARD Board Member
SANDRA D BOYD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 75 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 34 points above the peer median (60 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 30.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~16 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.