Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dan Pantano Executive Director
Anne Hagan Board President
Nan Altman Board President
Jerry Bennett Treasurer

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dan Pantano Executive Director
Anne Hagan Board President
Nan Altman Board President
Jerry Bennett Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dan Pantano Executive Director
Anne Hagan Board President
Nan Altman Board President
Jerry Bennett Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAN PANTANO Executive Director
ANNE HAGEN Board President
NAN ALTMAN Board President
JERRY BENNETT Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.