Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | — | — | — | 12 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 12 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 12 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 12 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 18 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | 36.4% | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | 21.9% | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | 20.1% | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOUGLAS W DAY | Board Member | — | ||
| RICHARD KAMINSKY | Board President | — | ||
| JAMES RODDEY | Board President | — | ||
| JUD D STEWART | Board Member | — | ||
| KAREN TABACCHI | Board Member | — | ||
| JAMES D TURCO | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 18 → 12 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.