Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUANITA SMITH Board President
JASON CALVELLO Secretary
CHRISTY STEVENSON Treasurer
PATRICK FOREY Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUANITA SMITH Board President
JASON CALVELLO Secretary
MICHELLE HARRIS Treasurer
PATRICK FOREY Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICK FOREY Board President
MICHELLE HARRIS Treasurer
STEVE KERR Board President
JASON CALVELLO Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in DE for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 42 over 5 years (improving by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.