Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 64 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 39 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 41 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Thompson | Board President | — | ||
| George Fulda | Board President | — | ||
| David Ritchey | Treasurer | — | ||
| Savannah Lagana | Secretary | — | ||
| Susy Moorstein | Board Member | — | ||
| Jill Figuerias | Board Member | — | ||
| Vincent Calhoun | Board Member | — | ||
| Riley Leonhardt | Board Member | — | ||
| Emily Burnworth | Board Member | — | ||
| Mary Gaskins | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christine Mastrangelo | Board President | — | ||
| Becky Gould-Levine | Board President | — | ||
| Nicholas Mastrangelo | Treasurer | — | ||
| Rebecca Harney | Board Member | — | ||
| Patrick McInerney | Board Member | — | ||
| Susy Moorstein | Board Member | — | ||
| Katherine Morris | Secretary | — | ||
| Nick MacFarlane | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 65 points above the peer median (100 vs. 35).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.