Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 13.2% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 2.3% 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 16.5% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 7.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 18.0% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 8.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2014 17.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 14.2% 48 Fragile Recovery
2012 20.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 24.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLOS ROGEL Executive Dir. 1.5% of Rev
JUDITH F BACA Board Member 1.1% of Rev
CHRISTINA SCHLESINGER Secretary
ZOJELIA FLORES Board President
ANTHONY SALCIDO Treasurer
MERCEDES GERTZ Board Member
MARTHA RAMIREZ-OROPEZA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 23 points above the peer median (60 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 54 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.