Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 6.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 3.9% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 5.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 5.0% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 5.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 5.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Baker Executive Director 5.7% of Rev
Megan Benn Board Member
Karen McIntosh-Telford Board Member
Debbie Kelleher Board Member
Toni Carver Board Member
Juan Renteria Jr Board Member
Amanda Ward Board Member
Beth Pepper Board Member
Meg Newville Board President
Matt Robinson Treasurer
Vicki Worster Board President
Lindsey Hawkins Board President
LeAnne Pence Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Baker Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
Megan Benn Board Member
LeAnne Pence Board Member
Karen McIntosh-Telford Board Member
Mark Ledbetter Board Member
Shannon Roth Board Member
Amanda Ward Board Member
Beth Pepper Board Member
Meg Newville Board President
Matt Robinson Treasurer
Vicki Worster Board President
Lindsey Hawkins Board President
Beth Muckala Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Baker Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
Vicki Worster Board President
Shannon Roth Board President
Matt Robinson Treasurer
Beth Muckala Secretary
Mark Ledbetter Board President
Miranda Beatty Board Member
Megan Benn Board Member
Lindsey Hawkins Board Member
Karen McIntosh-Telford Board Member
Ashley Murphy Board Member
Meg Newville Board Member
LeAnne Pence Board Member
Beth Pepper Board Member
Jennifer Vice Board Member
Amanda Ward Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (0 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.