Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
24
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 18.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — 21.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — 21.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 19.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 3.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY EVERETT Board Member 14.8% of Rev
MIKE GARDNER Secretary 3.2% of Rev
MELISSA SHEETS-NYGARD Board Member 0.3% of Rev
JOHN DARLING Board President 0.3% of Rev
BLAINE JOHNSON Board Member —
LORI FINKEN Treasurer —
DAVID BORLAUG Board President —
RHETT PAUL Board Member —
DIANE FLADELAND Board Member —
RACHEL SINNESS Board Member —
BETHANY ANDRIST Board Member —
GABRIELLE ABOUASSALY Board Member —
NIKHIL KALOTHIA Board Member —
JOEL WALTERS Board Member —
ANDREA BLESSUM Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY EVERETT Board Member 13.3% of Rev
MIKE GARDNER Secretary 3.1% of Rev
NATALIA VACARCIUC Board Member 1.5% of Rev
TOM WEIGEL Board Member 0.3% of Rev
RACHEL SINNESS Board Member 0.3% of Rev
BLAINE JOHNSON Board President —
CAROLE WATREL Board Member —
LORI FINKEN Treasurer —
DAVID BORLAUG Board President —
RHETT PAUL Board Member —
JANE MORROW Board Member —
DIANE FLADELAND Board Member —
GARY ADKISSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY EVERETT Board Member 12.9% of Rev
MIKE GARDNER Secretary 2.6% of Rev
NATALIA VACARCIUC BMSO ORCHESTRA REP 0.9% of Rev
RACHEL THOMASON BMSO ORCHESTRA REP 0.1% of Rev
BLAINE JOHNSON Board President —
AL WOLF Board Member —
WILLIAM PEARCE Board Member —
CAROLE WATREL Board Member —
LORI FINKEN Treasurer —
DAVID BORLAUG Board President —
RHETT PAUL Board Member —
JANE MORROW Board Member —
DIANE FLADELAND Board Member —
TOM WEIGEL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in ND with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (0 vs. 48).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.