Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHARON BURUM Board Member
SALLY BARNES Board Member
CHARLIE BURNS Board Member
DIANE CHAPEL Board Member
NOEL COLLINS Board President
TIPHANI CURRELL Board President
PATTY DIXON Board Member
LIZ DOTSON Board Member
SHELLY DUGAN Board Member
GINA FLESHER Secretary
REBECCA FRY Board Member
ALICA HALL Treasurer
JULIE BARNETT Board Member
TIPHANI CURRELL Board Member
SHARON BURUM Board Member
SALLY BARNES Board Member
CHARLIE BURNS Board Member
DIANE CHAPEL Board Member
TIPHANI CURRELL Board President
PATTY DIXON Treasurer
LIZ DOTSON Board President
GINA FLESHER Secretary
REBECCA FRY Board Member
TODD MURRAY Board Member
CATINA SUNDVALL Board Member
EDWARD DIXON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 41 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.