Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 19.0% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 12.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 16.2% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 18.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 14.8% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 16.1% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 16.3% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 16.1% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 15.3% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — 14.9% 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 14.9% 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 17.7% 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — 7.7% 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIDGET BETTKE Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
CHARLOTTE MOUQUIN EXECUTIVE DI 8.7% of Rev
SUSAN NATHENSON Board Member 0.4% of Rev
EMLYN TAVERAS Board Member 0.1% of Rev
MICHELLE ACOSTA Secretary —
JAY ANDERSON Board Member —
ALICIA CARMONA Board Member —
ESTEE CROSS Board Member —
SONA DAVIDIAN Board Member —
CHRIS EDDY Treasurer —
CHARLES FAZZINO Board Member —
BRENDA HARMS Board Member —
NANDINI ANANDU MD Board Member —
ROSEMARY MAGGIORE Board President —
NANCY MAZZEI Vice President —
JULIA FULLER NAKAYAMA BOARD PRESID —
JENNIFER ROHR BOARD MEM/TR —
EMILY SHARROCK Vice President —
REBECCA SILVER Board Member —
JACK SMITH Board Member —
MICHELE WESTRICK Board Member —
KD WILSON Board Member —
PAULA WOOD Vice President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLOTTE MOUQUIN Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
CHARLOTTE MOUQUIN Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
JAY ANDERSON Treasurer —
NANDINI ANANDU MD Board Member —
JENNIFER BLAND Board President —
ALICIA CARMONA Board Member —
JULIE CEPLER Board Member —
SONA DAVIDIAN Board Member —
DANA DIERSEN BUEHRER Board Member —
ALLISON DOUGLASS Board Member —
DIANE ESSIG Board Member —
CHARLES FAZZINO Board Member —
LAURA GOLDBERG Board Member —
BRENDA HARMS Board Member —
BOB HEMM Board Member —
KATE KERRIGAN Board Member —
LISA KOONCE Board President —
ANDREW LAVALLEE Board Member —
BARRY MASON Board Member —
BRIAN MCFARLAND Board Member —
PAULA MCKEEVER Board President —
AMY TODD MIDDLETON Board Member —
SUSAN NATHENSON Board Member —
KATE PRINGLE Secretary —
GRETCHEN PURSEL Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER TAHBAZ Board Member —
KD WILSON Board Member —
JAY ANDERSON Treasurer —
JENNIFER BLAND Board Member —
JULIE CEPLER Board Member —
SONA DAVIDIAN Board Member —
DANA DIERSEN BUEHRER Board Member —
DIANE ESSIG Board Member —
CHARLES FAZZINO Board Member —
LAURA GOLDBERG Board Member —
BOB HEMM Board Member —
KATE KERRIGAN Board Member —
LISA KOONCE Board President —
ANDREW LAVELLE Board Member —
BARRY MASON Board Member —
BRIAN MCFARLAND Board Member —
PAULA MCKEEVER Board President —
AMY TODD MIDDLETON Board Member —
SUSAN NATHANSON Board Member —
KATE PRINGLE Secretary —
CHRISTOPHER TAHBAZ Board Member —
KD WILSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points below the peer median (15 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.