Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 — — 8.2% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 18.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 4.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 4.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 3.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 4.0% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 3.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2010 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LACAVA Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
NOREEN DIAMOND BURDETT ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECT 3.3% of Rev
CECIL ADDERLEY Board President —
JARD CASSEDY Board Member —
DUSTIN LINDSEY Board Member —
BILL RICHTER Board Member —
BRIANNA CREAMER Board Member —
JULIE CARROLL Board Member —
TODD SHAFER Board Member —
AMANDA JOHNSON Board Member —
MEREDITH LORD Board Member —
ANDREA COOK Board Member —
REAGAN PARAS Board Member —
REBECCA DAMIANI Board Member —
ANTHONY BEATRICE Board President —
SARA DURKIN Secretary —
HEATHER COTE Board President —
STEPHANIE RILEY Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LACAVA Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
NOREEN DIAMOND BURDETT ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECT 3.3% of Rev
CECIL ADDERLEY Board President —
JARD CASSEDY Board Member —
SARA DURKIN Secretary —
HEATHER COTE Board President —
DUSTIN LINDSEY Board Member —
BILL RICHTER Board Member —
BRIANNA CREAMER Board Member —
JULIE CARROLL Board Member —
TODD SHAFER Board Member —
AMANDA JOHNSON Board Member —
MEREDITH LORD Board Member —
ANDREA COOK Board Member —
REAGAN PARAS Board Member —
REBECCA DAMIANI Board Member —
ANTHONY BEATRICE Board President —
STEPHANIE RILEY Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LACAVA Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
NOREEN DIAMOND BURDETT Executive Director 3.3% of Rev
CECIL ADDERLEY Board President —
THOMAS O'TOOLE Treasurer —
SARA DURKIN Secretary —
HEATHER COTE Board President —
SANDRA DONESKI Board President —
BILL RICHTER Board Member —
BRIANNA CREAMER Board Member —
THOMAS BANKERT Board Member —
TODD SHAFER Board Member —
AMANDA JOHNSON Board Member —
SARAH ALLEN SANTOS Board Member —
MEREDITH LORD Board Member —
ANDREA COOK Board Member —
REAGAN PARAS Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN Board Member —
REBECCA DAMIANI Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points below the peer median (25 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 39 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.