Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 5.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 1.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 4.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 4.9% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 4.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 3.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 5.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 4.5% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 3.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 4.8% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 4.6% 53 Fragile Recovery
2012 4.8% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN BEAUDOIN Executive Director 1.6% of Rev
TERESA AVERY Executive Director 0.8% of Rev
LAWRENCE A HAMERMESH Treasurer
SUSAN BOOKER Board Member
ROBERT RINALDI Board Member
JONATHAN H SALVIN MD Board Member
CHRIS STOUT Board President
BRUCE DITTMAR PHD Board Member
MARIE STEWART Board Member
JENNIFER CRESSWELL Board President
ELYSE POINSETT Secretary
NINA ANDERSON DNP Board Member
JOHN G DAY Board Member
DAVID L DEVOLL Board Member
KATHY NACHBAR Board Member
ELIZABETH STOUT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kate Ransom Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
John du Pont Board President
Kris Venkatesh Board President
Richard Facciolo Board President
Lawrence A Hamermesh Treasurer
David B Brown Board Member
Scott Burris Secretary
Jan E Christopher Board Member
Peter Compo Board Member
Thomas Cover Board Member
Veronica Eid Board Member
Bryan Fitzgerald Board Member
Witt Godden Board Member
Christopher Kraus Board Member
Dina Neiman-Abdesalam Board Member
Jonathan H Salvin MD Board Member
Diane Shomper Board Member
Marie Stewart Board Member
Chris Stout Board Member
Bruce Dittmar Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATE RANSOM Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
JOHN DU PONT Board President
KRIS VENKATESH Board President
RICHARD FACCIOLO Board President
LAWRENCE A HAMERMESH Treasurer
BRYAN FITZGERALD Secretary
SCOTT BURRIS Board Member
TOM CARROLL Board Member
JAN E CHRISTOPHER Board Member
THOMAS COVER Board Member
VERONICA EID Board Member
WITT GODDEN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER KRAUS Board Member
HOLLY LISSNER Board Member
DAVID MOLOTSKY Board Member
DINA NEIMAN-ABDESALAM Board Member
DIANE SHOMPER Board Member
MARIE STEWART Board Member
CHRIS STOUT Board Member
BRUCE DITTMAR Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATE RANSOM Executive Director 4.2% of Rev
LAWRENCE A HAMERMESH Board President
JOHN DU PONT Board President
HOLLY LISSNER Treasurer
MARY JO ANDERSON Board Member
TOM CARROLL Board Member
JAN CHRISTOPHER Board Member
THOMAS COVER Board Member
BRUCE DITTMAR PHD Board Member
VERONICA EID Board Member
RICHARD FACCIOLO Board Member
BRYAN FITZGERALD Secretary
DAVID MOLOTSKY Board Member
DINA NEIMAN Board Member
DIANE SHOMPER Board Member
MARIE STEWART Board Member
KARLEEN STRAYER Board Member
KRIS VENKATESH Board Member
CHRIS STOUT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.