Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
38
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 57.0% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 9.7% 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 32.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2010 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christine Dally Executive Director 13.4% of Rev
Kim Anderson Executive Director 13.4% of Rev
Wendy Koch Board President
Lorrie Shank Board President
Melinni Taylor Board President
Suzanne Dennis Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christine Dally Board President
Suzanne Dennis Vice President
Lorrie Shank Vice President
Kim Anderson Vice President
David Wilcox Board Member
Luanne Barron Board Member
Melinni Taylor Board Member
Twila Latini Board Member
Won-Mi Koch Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christine Dally Board President
Suzanne Dennis Board President
Lorrie Shank Board President
David Wilcox Board President
Kim Anderson Board Member
Luanne Barron Board Member
Elizabeth Brading Board Member
Twila Latini Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 8 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points below the peer median (42 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 38 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 57.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.