Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.9% 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 17.4% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 13.2% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 10 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 55.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 45.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 26.8% 37 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 — — 42.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 28.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 51.6% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 — — 8.7% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY MCGUIRE Board Member 20.7% of Rev
STEVE BREEDEN Board Member —
MERLE HADACHEK Board Member —
LYNN RIDDER Board Member —
GREG MCGUIRE Board President —
MARLEA JAMES Secretary —
SHANNON SHORT Treasurer —
SKYLAR TUXHORN Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WAYLON SHEETZ Board Member —
STEVE BREEDEN Board Member —
REBECCA BENYSHEK Board Member —
AMY MCGUIRE Board Member —
LESA ZENGER Board Member —
BRIAN YOUNG Board Member —
PAT STINDT Board Member —
LORA GIEBER Board Member —
MIKEL HADACHEK Treasurer —
MERLE HADACHEK Board President —
DR ANDY WALKER Board President —
MARLEA JAMES Secretary —
SHELLY PACHTA Board Member —
STEVE BREEDEN Board Member —
KELLY COLLARD Board Member —
AMY MCGUIRE Board Member —
LESA ZENGER Board Member —
GREG MCGUIRE Board Member —
LORA GIEBER Board Member —
MIKEL HADACHEK Treasurer —
MERLE HADACHEK Board President —
DR ANDY WALKER Board President —
MARLEA JAMES Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 40 points below the peer median (45 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 10 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 33 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 23.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.