Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 22.2% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 20.4% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 8.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 16.0% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 10.3% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 5.9% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 6.7% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 8.0% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.8% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 10.7% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 13.1% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 11.3% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 13.0% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HANK OSTERHAUT FINAL EXEC D 16.9% of Rev
STACEY SCHNEIDER EXECUTIVE DI 7.0% of Rev
CARON DAUGHERTY Board Member —
MIKE HELBERT Board Member —
JEFF KITSELMAN VICE PRESIDE —
MICHAEL LANG Board Member —
ANTHONY MERCER Treasurer —
BRYAN SILVERSON Board Member —
JUSTIN TABARES Board Member —
JAN TRAYLOR Board Member —
NORMA WATSON Secretary —
BRAD YOUNT Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REBECA HERRERA Board Member 17.4% of Rev
STACEY SCHNEIDER Executive Director 13.9% of Rev
BRAD YOUNT Treasurer —
JAN TRAYLOR Board Member —
MIKE HELBERT Board President —
NORMA WATSON Secretary —
BRYAN SILVERSON Board Member —
JEFF KITSELMAN Board President —
PETE RYDBERG Board Member —
JUSTIN TABARES Board Member —
CARON DAUGHERTY Board Member —
CAROL LUCY Board Member —
ANTHONY MERCER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REBECA HERRERA Executive Director 19.0% of Rev
SONJA HODGES Board Member —
MARY SUE WADE Board Member —
BRAD YOUNT Treasurer —
JAN TRAYLOR Board Member —
MIKE HELBERT Board President —
NORMA WATSON Secretary —
BRYAN SILVERSON Board Member —
JEFF KITSELMAN Board President —
CORY ANDERSON Board Member —
EARL HOFFMAN Board Member —
THOMAS FELTS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 75 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.