Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 10.0% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 9.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 6.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 7.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 10.5% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 7.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 12.7% 49 Fragile Recovery
2011 14.1% 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENDRA KUHLMAN Executive Director 10.0% of Rev
Kendra Kuhlman Executive Director 8.5% of Rev
Samantha DeChant Board President
Tom Addair Board President
Carrie Alt Treasurer
Heather McCornack Secretary
Brian Niehoff Board President
Emily Trent Board Member
Kassie Moran Board Member
Lynda Bachelor Board Member
Shawn White Board Member
Steve Galitzer Board Member
SAMANTHA DECHANT Board President
HEATHER MCCORNACK Secretary
CARRIE ALT Treasurer
TOM ADDAIR Board President
DANIELLE GOODBAND Board Member
BRIEN NIEHOFF Board Member
DWIGHT TOLAR Board Member
STEVE GALITZER Board Member
TONY BALLARD Board Member
CHUCK LEONARD Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PENELOPE SENFTEN Executive Dir. 9.1% of Rev
PENELOPE SENFTEN Executive Dir. 6.3% of Rev
SAMANTHA DECHANT Board President 1.0% of Rev
GARRIC BAKER Board President
SAMANTHA DECHANT Board Member
JEREMY PLATT Board Member
DAN RICHARDS Treasurer
MARK ROSE Board President
TOM ADDAIR Board Member
HEATHER MCCORNACK Board Member
SHERRI MINICK Board Member
DWIGHT TOLAR Board Member
BEN WATERS Board Member
CARRIE ALT Board Member
TOM ADDAIR Board Member
DANIELLE GOODBAND Board Member
BRIAN NIEHOFF Board President
STEVE GALITZER Board Member
CHUCK LEONARD Board Member
TONY BALLARD Board Member
HEATHER MCCORNACK Secretary
DWIGHT TOLAR Board Member
CARRIE ALT Treasurer
KENDRA KUHLMAN Executive Dir.

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PENELOPE SENFTEN Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
DAVID ALEXANDER Board President
MARK ROSE Board President
GARRIC BAKER Secretary
DAN RICHARDS Treasurer
KRISTIN BRIGHTON Board Member
KITRA COOPER Board Member
CLIVE FULLAGAR Board Member
STEVE GALITZER Board Member
JULIE GIBBS Board Member
KENDRA KUHLMAN Board Member
SUE MAES Board Member
JEREMY PLATT Board Member
JEFF SACKRIDER Board Member
MICHELLE SINK Board Member
JENNIFER SMITH Board Member
SAMANTHA DECHANT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PENELOPE SENFTEN Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
DAVID ALEXANDER Board President
MARK ROSE Board President
GARRIC BAKER Secretary
DAN RICHARDS Treasurer
KRISTIN BRIGHTON Board Member
KITRA COOPER Board Member
CLIVE FULLAGAR Board Member
STEVE GALITZER Board Member
JULIE GIBBS Board Member
KENDRA KUHLMAN Board Member
SUE MAES Board Member
JEREMY PLATT Board Member
JEFF SACKRIDER Board Member
MICHELLE SINK Board Member
JENNIFER SMITH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 21 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.