Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.8% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 10.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 16.6% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 18.5% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 11.9% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 11.0% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONI VAUGHN Board Member
ERIC PORTER Board Member
JANE SYMMONDS Board Member
JOHN DECKER Board Member
ROBERTA EICHENBERG Board President
BARB LOWERY Board Member
COLLEEN MITCHELL Board President
JILL NEWLAND Board Member
MARY SHIVLEY Board Member
ROBERTA SWANSON Treasurer
SARAH EIMER Secretary
DAVE MARKOWITZ Board Member
JONI AUSTENFELD Board Member
ROY MANN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERESA MALEY Board Member
JODI CASE Board Member
COLLEEN MITCHELL Board Member
JILL NEWLAND Board Member
DAN ROBERTSON Board Member
MARY SHIVLEY Board Member
MARJORIE WERLY Board Member
ROBERTA SWANSON Board Member
JONI VAUGHN Treasurer
ERIC PORTER Board President
JANE SYMMONDS Secretary
PAM CORDLE Board Member
JOHN DECKER Board Member
ROBERTA EICHENBERG Board Member
BARB LOWERY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONI VAUGHN Treasurer
CHRIS RECH Board President
ERIC PORTER Board President
JANE SYMMONDS Secretary
PAM CORDLE Board Member
JOHN DECKER Board Member
ROBERTA EICHENBERG Board Member
BARB LOWERY Board Member
TERESA MALEY Board Member
DAVE MARKOWITZ Board Member
COLLEEN MITCHELL Board Member
JILL NEWLAND Board Member
DAN ROBERTSON Board Member
MARY SHIVLEY Board Member
MARJORIE WERLY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 21 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 54 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.