Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Decline Risk
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW RUNNELLS-REBOL Treasurer
SHELLY STEWART BANKS Board Member
TED COLLINS Board Member
KAT RUPRECHT Secretary
TRACY FOX Board Member
JO BLEDSOE COLLINS Board President
NANCY KRUSE Board Member
LAUREN RYAN DIRETOR
SPENCER THOMPSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RITA MARKS Treasurer
SHELLY STEWART BANKS Board President
TED COLLINS BUILDING MANAGER
AMANDA ALBERT Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 59 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points above the peer median (90 vs. 43).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 54 → 57 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.