Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.3% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 14.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 14.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 13.1% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 13.3% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 12.5% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 12.4% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 13.7% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 12.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 13.3% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 13.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 8.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 19.2% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL SPICER EXECUTIVE DI 12.1% of Rev
GILDA ALVAREZ Board Member
ASHLEY BOWER Board Member
KELLY BROWN Secretary
WILLIAM BROWN Board Member
SHAWNA CARTER Board Member
RALITA CHEEKS Board Member
JEFF EBEL Board Member
ALEX ENGELLAND Board President
PATRICK HOFFMAN VICE PRESIDE
SUE HOLMES Board Member
BOB JONES Board Member
MATT PERRY Board Member
AMY SCHREINER Treasurer
MARC SHEFORGEN Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL SPICER EXECUTIVE DI 11.3% of Rev
GILDA ALVAREZ Board Member
ASHLEY BOWER Board Member
KELLY BROWN Board Member
WILLIAM BROWN Board Member
SHAWNA CARTER Board Member
RALITA CHEEKS Board Member
JEFF EBEL Board Member
ALEX ENGELLAND Secretary
MICHAEL FREELAND Board Member
MANDI GRABER Board President
PATRICK HOFFMAN VICE PRESIDE
SUE HOLMES Board Member
BOB JONES Board Member
LUCI LARSON Board Member
MATT PERRY Board Member
AMY SCHREINER Treasurer
MARC SHEFORGEN Board Member
CAROLYN SICHLEY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL SPICER EXECUTIVE DI 15.7% of Rev
CHAZ COBERLY Board President
MICHAEL FREELAND VICE PRESIDE
MANDI GRABER Secretary
BOB SALEM Treasurer
KATHY MARTIN Board Member
JUANELLE GARRETSON Board Member
JULIE GOETZ Board Member
LUCI LARSON Board Member
SCOTT PRICE Board Member
AMY SCHREINER Board Member
CAROLYN SICHLEY Board Member
MARC SHEFORGEN Board Member
GILDA ALVAREZ Board Member
BOB JONES Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL SPICER EXECUTIVE DI 11.3% of Rev
CHAZ COBERLY Board President
MICHAEL FREELAND VICE PRESIDE
MANDI GRABER Secretary
BOB SALEM Treasurer
PAM JONES Board Member
JUANELLE GARRETSON Board Member
JULIE GOETZ Board Member
JARED HIATT Board Member
LUCI LARSON Board Member
SCOTT PRICE Board Member
AMY SCHREINER Board Member
CAROLYN SICHLEY Board Member
MARC SHEFORGEN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL SPICER EXECUTIVE DI 12.3% of Rev
CHAZ COBERLY Board President
MICHAEL FREELAND VICE PRESIDE
AMANDA GRABER Secretary
BOB SALEM Treasurer
JUANELLE GARRETSON Board Member
JULIE GOETZ Board Member
JARED HIATT Board Member
LUCI LARSON Board Member
SCOTT PRICE Board Member
AMY SCHREINER Board Member
CAROLYN SICHLEY Board Member
MARC SHEFORGEN Board Member
PAM JONES Board Member
RICHARD PAULS Board Member
LEXY SCHWARZ Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 59 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.