Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES FREEMAN Artistic Director —
HEIDI JACOB ASSISTANT CONDUCTOR —
JAY FLUELLEN Board President —
PETER BRUWASSER Treasurer —
CYNTHIA FOLIO Board Member —
JAMES FREEMAN Artistic Director —
HEIDI JACOB ASSISTANT CONDUCTOR —
JAY FLUELLEN Board President —
PETER BRUWASSER Treasurer —
CYNTHIA FOLIO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAY FLUELLEN Board President —
PETER BURWASSER Treasurer —
CYNTHIA FOLIO Secretary —
ROBERT P MORGAN Board Member —
JAMES FREEMAN Artistic Director —
ROBERT P MORGAN Board Member —
JAMES FREEMAN Artistic Director —
JAY FLUELLEN Board President —
PETER BURWASSER Treasurer —
CYNTHIA FOLIO Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 41 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (20 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.